When Things Go Wrong
When something “goes wrong” in our lives, which is
to say, when we either don’t get something we want (which
can come to us in a mind dizzying array of possibilities) and/or when we find we get something we don’t want (which,
for all intents and purposes essentially means getting some form, some
expression, some degree, or some experience of pain) we have a choice
about how to respond/react. Many of us however, consistently choose blame as the
principal go to response/reaction. So
when we either don’t get something we want and/or when we get something we didn’t
want…
We can…
1.
Blame ourselves.
2.
Blame someone else.
3.
Blame a group or community of people.
4.
Blame both ourselves, someone else, and
additionally blame some group or community of people
5.
Blame some situation, circumstance, or reality
that is present in our lives at the time like a recession, or being unemployed,
or being diagnosed cancer, etc.
6.
Blame God.
7.
Blame one or more dead people like a parent who
physically abused us or a drunk driver who crashed into our car many years ago,
causing us to be wheelchair bound for the rest of our life.
8.
Blame some phenomenon that does in fact exists
or that we believe exists in the world such as astrology, fate, bad luck, bad
weather, “acts of God,” etc.
9.
Blame some single or some collection of social,
organizational, structural, governmental flaws, imperfections, and syndromes
such as the history of slavery that various groups of people on the planet have
a history of being subjected to over the course of human history, structural
and generational racism, patriarchy, sexism, homophobia/heterosexism, “Obama
Care,” etc.
10. Blame
one or more personal life circumstances, situations, influences, experiences,
personal histories, and/or perceived personal limitations or personal traumas,
being born into poverty, being abused either as a child or in adulthood or
both, or being dyslexic or being born with a congenital heart defect, etc.
11. Blame
some combination of numbers 5, 6, 7, 8,
9 and 10.
12. Or
we can do none of that and go within and go from there.
We may be very tempted to dismiss #12 as a viable option for
us. We may be very highly aware that some of the things that show up on our
personal list in terms of #9 and #10 are indeed very real problems, very
real difficulties, and very real challenges in the world that can and often do
cause very real pain, very real suffering, very real trauma, and very real,
tangible grief in the world and that we as individual people can
also personally experience and be very hurt, impacted, abused,
marginalized, disenfranchised, and/or extremely limited by in certain ways.
Because of all of this we may conclude that #12 does not apply to us, is a
joke, is unrealistic, is only an option for people who do not have a rational
understanding of the world, is only for “suckers,” is only an option for white
people, etc. I understand all of this. I have compassion for all of us and for
all the pain we have all experienced in this life and that we either may or may
not be trying to actively work through or on.
I assure you however, none of that are reasons to dismiss
#12 out of hand, as an option for you personally regardless of the pain nor the
extent of pain and trauma you have experienced in life. However, it may be true
that you simply may not currently be at a place either emotionally,
psychologically and/or spiritually to invite into your conscious awareness the
level of desire for liberation that is necessary to honestly and seriously do
the work that is required when choosing #12. That’s OK. Only you know about
that. I do not. I am only the messenger here.
Some more about
blame
Social science research shows us that the process of blaming
comes about as a result of, among other things, experiencing pain, dis-ease,
and discomfort emotionally and physically and also having the experience of
understanding that these feelings need to somehow dissipate; that they must go
somewhere. There are both functional and dysfunctional ways to dissipate these
feelings inside of us. Sincerely and honestly surrendering to what is, is an
example of a functional way to dissipate these feelings. So is engaging in some
type of compassion practice and/or what we know in Buddhism as “metta
practice.” A dysfunctional way of attempting to dissipate these feelings is by
blaming—either blaming self, blaming others, or blaming some personal, life, or
some societal situation, circumstance or reality.
Blaming also comes about as a result of a fear of being made to feel vulnerable, a fear of confrontation, and an inability to hold oneself accountable for the feelings we experience and/or an inability to hold others accountable for how we perceive them as treating us when that perception is that we have been treated in a way we experience as being negative or counterproductive.
Blaming also comes about as a result of a fear of being made to feel vulnerable, a fear of confrontation, and an inability to hold oneself accountable for the feelings we experience and/or an inability to hold others accountable for how we perceive them as treating us when that perception is that we have been treated in a way we experience as being negative or counterproductive.
A.
Fear of
being vulnerable: When we have an interaction with another and we come away
from that interaction feeling hurt or somehow unappreciated, disrespected, or a
whole host of other possibilities, it is our job, when deemed appropriate, to somehow find the courage to
tell the person how we are feeling in a way where we are not consciously adding
more negativity to the situation. Doing this, among other things, requires the
ability to be vulnerable. The reason this requires vulnerability is because
there is always a possibility, no matter how lovingly and how gently we express
this to the other person, that the other person may reject us and very few of us are
truly welcoming of the experience of being rejected.
B.
Fear of
confrontation: Telling someone how an interaction we have had with him or
her has not gone well for us or has us experiencing some negativity not only
brings with it the possibility of rejection, it also brings with it a something
less extreme, which is the fear of some kind of confrontation taking place.
Many people have a very deep fear of confrontation, chiefly because there is a
fear that this will in fact lead to the more extreme experience of rejection.
C.
Holding
oneself accountable: When we tell someone how we perceive an interaction
with them has negatively impacted us we are holding ourselves accountable for
being vulnerable enough and also being emotionally mature enough to be honest
with ourselves about having these feelings and with being comfortable enough
with our emotional truth to express this to the other person.
D.
Holding
the other person accountable: When we tell someone how we perceive an interaction
with them has negatively impacted us we are also holding the other person
accountable for whatever action they may have engaged in during the interaction
that may have been problematic.
Forgiveness
For many of us forgiveness—both forgiving of ourselves and
the forgiving of others and possibly even forgiving God or forgiving society—is
extremely difficult. One of the reasons we may be so quick to blame is because
on some level, either consciously or unconsciously, we have difficulty with
forgiving or with forgiveness itself.
How We Perceive
the World and How We then hold those Perceptions
You may also find that when you look out into the world, you
only see or mostly see “problems.” This may take the form of violence, a lot of
pain, or a lot of suffering. All of this and more may collectively create your
principal view of the world. When you think a little bit more about all of
this, you may have the thought that one of the reasons there are so many
problems and so much suffering in the world is because…
1.
People are basically bad.
2.
People are basically selfish.
3.
People are basically stupid
4.
People are basically greedy.
5.
People are too heartless.
6.
People are too self-absorbed.
7.
The world is going to Hell. People have
abandoned God and simply need to find Jesus and accept him as their personal
savior, and place him front and center in their lives.
8.
Some or most people in the world are simply not
as smart as me (you may be very hesitant to admit this is something you think
or believe. However, it is very important to be as honest with yourself as
possible here).
9.
People are simply not religious or spiritual
enough.
10. People
are too conservative.
11. People
are too liberal.
12. People
don’t take enough personal responsibility, for their actions, in their own
lives
If anything in that above list serves as something of a “go
to” thought for you—a though or set of thoughts you often or fairly often find
yourself having, you may be someone who may approach life primary through an
external locus of control rather than through an internal locus of control.
Locus of control
Locus of control (whether external or internal), in various
branches of psychology, is seen as what points toward how we perceive where
power is mostly located, in our lives. In other words, for our purposes here,
people who understand the world primarily through an external locust of control
tend to look to others, or to other life situations, circumstances, and
realities in order to understand and explain their world and their experience
of that world. People with a more internally based locus of control tend to
look within to understand their world. I am oversimplifying this concept at
this point. I will go into more detail about locus of control in later
discourses. For now I will give a simple example of both. In these examples
there are two people in a classroom situation. Both people recently got their
test papers back in their history class. Both students received a “D” on the
test. Student A comes from an external locus of control orientation and so when
attempting to understand why she received the low test score she comes up with
these thoughts: The teacher doesn’t like me. The room was very uncomfortable the day of
the test and this was a serious distraction. The instructor framed the
questions on the test in a very unclear way, etc. Student B, on the other hand, comes from an internal locus of
control orientation when trying to understand his low score on the test. He
comes up with these thoughts: I didn’t study adequately enough for the
test. I didn’t allow myself to get enough sleep the night before the test. I
didn’t understand some of the questions on the test clearly enough, etc.
There is not necessary anything inherently wrong
with the existence of either locus of control in our lives. No man or no women
is an island in this world after all, people are undoubtedly social beings, and
it is impossible to separate ourselves completely from the environments that
are around us and that we are also around. The difficulty arises however, when
this gets out of balance, when we only view our experience through an
external prism or only view our experience through an internal prism.
Some questions for self reflection
Does it feel good when I assign blame?
If it truly feels good when I blame, why does it feel good?
Who or what has control over my life?
Who or what has the power in my life?
Who or what have I given power to in my life?
What is my idea of being truly free?
Am I free?
Do other people understand me?
Do other people like me?
What are the five most common feelings I experience?
No comments:
Post a Comment